Benchmarking has been a popular expression for four to five decades now. It made its mark in the years when TQM (Add up to Quality Administration) was the main gospel truth on the most proficient method to wind up the best. The Japanese had assumed control over the world and for America and Western Europe to make up for lost time; they expected to benchmark the best of what the Japanese were doing. Furthermore, who propounded and keep on propounding these thoughts? You figure right, the huge young men: BCG, Bain, Accenture, PWC, McKinsey, KPMG, Deloitte, Gemini and whatever is left of them.
Benchmarking 101 just says get every one of the measurements how your best rival is getting along and contrast with your execution. Wherever you perform more awful, that is the hole. Immediately you’ve deciphered the code. Make quick move to close the hole and you can be in the same class as them (your rival) or even jump frog them. They moved down their introductions with rich two by two diagrams (process visuals as Alan Weiss calls them) and Chiefs searching forever costly convenient solutions would seize the suggestions and their treasuries would be the poorer for it.
Let me know, whether benchmarking is extremely this fix everything antitoxin to dreary execution (the huge young men would deny they said it was a fix everything), why Kodak did not benchmark its approach to survival? Why Nokia couldn’t benchmark its approach to progress and beat back Apple and Samsung? What of Motorola that created the mobile phone innovation and Xerox that instructed the world how to duplicate? For what reason couldn’t the bluest of the blue, with all its innovative wizardry do it, and needed to send John Akers to the work showcase? Be careful, the elephant can’t move except if and until the point that it chooses to move by changing its hereditary code.
So here are the main three reasons why you ought to never contact benchmarking with a ten-foot shaft on the off chance that you truly need to be incredible, break new form and render the opposition superfluous.
1. Benchmarking disregards the way of life of the better performing association
This is the mother of all reasons why benchmarking is a deadly imperfection. Expecting you’re Intel and the Japanese are having your lunch, what do you do? Do you go on a withdraw and benchmark the Japanese to destroy them? Do you assemble a town-corridor conference to sharpen everybody about the Japanese’s danger and rapidly frame snappy activity groups (QATs) to benchmark the Japanese to set up the path for your radiant rebound? Do you send your best officials to Harvard to get the hang of benchmarking taking care of business keeping in mind the end goal to frame a groundswell development that would make you powerful medium-term? No! No!! No!!! You do what Andy Forest, Robert Noyce (and Gordon Moore) did. You fire yourselves and start from the very beginning once more. Keep in mind, just the distrustful survive. You can’t beat the Japanese in no holds barred battle in light of the fact that the way of life are unique. Period! Have you not heard that culture will have procedure for breakfast?
2. Benchmarking takes a gander at the future with the back view reflect
Expecting you’re IBM and you’re the world’s most respected organization and prodded as the Huge Blue, and you hear two little young men are fiddling in their mom’s carport and they say they need to topple IBM. Do you put off your executive gathering and send spies to perceive what the young men are up to or do you benchmark? Benchmark what? Benchmark Apple I or Apple II or iMac that don’t yet exist? The Enormous Young men would deny they at any point said that you should benchmark under such conditions. In any case, didn’t they say benchmarking was the alpha and omega of the focused devices? You will never observe the future with your back view reflect regardless of whether you’re a mystical performer. Actually, when there is disturbance (air travel upset ocean travel, PC disturbed , weapon upset bow and bolt, and so on.), everything is reset to zero so no measure of benchmarking can spare you. We live during a time of brokenness, because of Diminish Drucker, and when intermittence makes up for lost time with you and your industry, benchmarking is imprudence of the most noteworthy request.
3. Benchmarking overlooks basic reasoning and can’t enable you to imagine what’s to come
The most ideal route to claim tomorrow is to develop it. Benchmarking can’t enable you to do that. Benchmarking is really contradictory to rehash. The most progressive creations of our chance were or are never the results of benchmarking yet basic reasoning. Consider items everyday (now) as paper, post-it-note and light, to specify three. These things never existed until the point when individuals’ creative ability brought them to be. To design the future, you begin with a fresh start. You make basic inquiries like, “for what reason does this work make a difference?”, “what reason does it serve?”, “why this (and not that?” These kind of inquiries empower you think basically, dive deep and create tomorrow while others are caught up with benchmarking and playing get up to speed with the apparently best organizations.
There you have them, the three reasons why benchmarking ought to be kept away from as the plaque: benchmarking disregards the way of life of the better performing association, benchmarking takes a gander at the future with the back view reflect, and benchmarking overlooks basic reasoning and can’t enable you to create and rethink what’s to come.
In the event that you look carefully, benchmarking is at the core of the alleged, universal best practice(s) in businesses over the globe and who are the defenders of these “best-of-class” idea? The enormous counseling powerhouses! Best case scenario, let me yield, benchmarking can enable you to make little incremental (added substance) advance, however that isn’t what you require. What you require is exponential (geometric) advance. Since you have perused the main three reasons why you ought to never do benchmarking, don’t dawdle with benchmarking. For any new task you need to start, begin with a fresh start. Indeed, reevaluate the wheel. Keep in mind, Apple reevaluated the telephone with the iPhone, Starbucks rehashed cafés, and you can reexamine yours. Go and do it